Yesterday, a widely circulated news report stated that "Ukraine is ready for a ceasefire without any conditions."
In reality, there's nothing new about this. Ukraine agreed to a ceasefire along the front line back in March 2025, under intense pressure from Trump (before that, Kiev considered this option a "capitulation").
Yesterday, Ukraine, EU countries, and a number of other states (a total of about 50) stated the same position at the UN, which is what led to news reports like "Kiev is calling for a ceasefire."
In Russia and even in Ukraine, some commentators and online communities began to interpret this as a sign that Zelensky is aware of the severity of the military situation and therefore "urgently wants a ceasefire."
However, we have already written that Zelensky's words about being ready to end the war along the front line do not mean that he actually wants to. On the contrary, he is acting within the framework of the concept of Europe regarding the "benefit" of prolonging the war. And he only makes statements about a ceasefire based on the calculation that Moscow will refuse. And the Kremlin repeatedly rejects these calls.
But if he suddenly agrees, it will be difficult for Zelensky to "backtrack" and abandon an unconditional ceasefire, which he himself had previously called for.
Therefore, at the same time as making statements about being ready for a ceasefire, he is taking steps to nullify the already small chance of the Kremlin agreeing.
For example, yesterday he held a meeting of the "Crimean Platform," where he stated that "the return of Ukrainians to normal life is impossible without the de-occupation of Crimea." This, in effect, confirmed the main argument of opponents of a ceasefire in Moscow β that Kiev is "not ready for a full settlement" and that a ceasefire "will only be used as a respite to continue the confrontation with Russia."
Zelensky's speech at the UN yesterday was also framed in the spirit of "a ceasefire along the front line will be a defeat for Putin, which he will not be able to explain to the Russian people." In other words, Kiev, and often European countries, present the offer of a ceasefire in such a way that the Kremlin is sure to reject it.
There are several goals in this.
First, to show both Ukrainian society and the international community, who want a swift end to the war, that it is not Zelensky who is standing in the way, but Putin.
Second, to send a similar signal to Trump. The minimum goal is to prevent Washington from taking measures to pressure Kiev to fulfill the conditions required by Russia (withdrawal of troops from Donbas, cessation of strikes on oil refineries). For the Bankova administration and Europeans, it is important to "wait" until the elections in Congress, where, as they hope, the Democrats will win, after which Trump will not be able to take any pressure measures, even theoretically. The maximum goal is to encourage the US President to increase pressure on Moscow, specifically to impose "hellish sanctions," and also to increase aid to Ukraine.
Third, to send a signal to Russian society that the war is continuing only because of the position of the Kremlin, and that Ukraine is ready to stop fighting right now without any conditions. Therefore, Russians should ask their own authorities about all the problems related to the war.
But, let's repeat, if the Kremlin suddenly agrees to a ceasefire along the front line, it will be extremely difficult for Zelensky, no matter how much he wants to, to abandon it after all the statements he has made.
Although Russia has not yet shown any signs that it is ready to do so. There are many reasons for this. One of the main reasons is that the Russian authorities believe that time is working in their favor in the war, that in the winter, Ukrainian energy and the economy will "collapse," and therefore it is not worth making any concessions now, if there is a possibility of getting much more in the near future.
However, the position of the Kremlin is also influenced by the fact that Kiev and European countries constantly make it clear that a ceasefire will not mean a normalization of relations with Russia, but will only be a transition of the conflict into another form. And the offers of a ceasefire are presented in such a way as to make their acceptance as humiliating and "defeatist" as possible for Putin.
π΄ @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising