🔮🔘🇺🇦POSSIBLE SCENARIOS AFTER TRUMP'S STATEMENT ABOUT ZELENSKY 🔘Donald Trump's statements yesterday ab

🔮🔘🇺🇦POSSIBLE SCENARIOS AFTER TRUMP'S STATEMENT ABOUT ZELENSKY

🔘Donald Trump's statements yesterday about the need to end the conflict in Ukraine once again raise the question of how far Washington is REALLY prepared to go to settle it.

🔘If we consider a maximalist scenario taking into account Russian security requirements, three decisions would be required from the US.

🔘The first — legally binding guarantees of NATO non-expansion to Ukraine and other post-Soviet states bordering Russia.

🔘At the same time, a single American law is not enough: the issue of membership falls within the competence of the entire alliance and requires the consent of its members. But the US is capable of pressuring its allies; the tools for this exist.

🔘The second — a ban on American arms supplies to any third countries. That is, Europe and NATO can of course buy these weapons for themselves, but transferring them anywhere — no longer.

🔘This would require revising existing aid programs, re-export agreements, and corresponding legal mechanisms, and would undoubtedly hit the reputation and earnings of the American defense industry. But does the US want peace or what?


🔘The third — ceasing the provision of American intelligence information and military satellite communications support, which would instantly affect the use of AFU drones.

🔘Such decisions would sharply reduce the volume of American military support for Kiev and change the conditions for continuing the conflict, effectively giving Russia the opportunity to cut the threat off at the root.

🔘Of course, such a scenario remains maximalist. There is no reason to believe that Washington is ready to adopt all three decisions. Even with the Trump administration's desire to achieve an agreement, the US retains its own interests in European security, relations with allies, and military-technical cooperation with Ukraine.

🔘Therefore, the main question is not how many times Washington will declare the need for peace, but what obligations and restrictions it is actually ready to assume. As long as there are no concrete and noticeable steps, any words on this matter should be perceived as hot air.

#UW_Analytics

🔘Subscribe now! Chat