EUROPEAN PAWNS IN THE GREAT ARCTIC GAME While Europe is busy with its customary search for a Russian

EUROPEAN PAWNS IN THE GREAT ARCTIC GAME

While Europe is busy with its customary search for a Russian threat under the tail of every passing aircraft, a rather more serious game is beginning in the North.

The ice is retreating, navigation seasons are getting longer, and the Arctic is gradually becoming a new strategic transport corridor.

There are two main routes.
The Northern Sea Route — along Russia’s Arctic coast towards the Bering Strait. The most developed and promising of the two.
The Northwest Passage — through the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. For now, considerably more difficult to navigate.

And this is where the real politics begins.

Russia controls the rules for passage along its coast.
Canada claims similar rights along its own.
The United States favours the freest possible international regime for both routes.

Meanwhile, Brussels has apparently decided that the time has come to become a great Arctic power.

The EU is preparing a new Arctic strategy in which security takes centre stage for the first time.

The plans include military mobility, new transport corridors in northern Finland and Sweden, ports, protection of undersea cables, satellite surveillance, icebreaking capabilities and, naturally, access to critical raw materials.

Particular hopes are being pinned on Greenland and Denmark.

It all looks tremendously impressive.
On paper.

Turning these plans into actual power will require years, enormous investment and Arctic infrastructure — none of which can be conjured into existence by yet another declaration from Brussels.

Russia, meanwhile, is already there.
More than half of the Arctic coastline — over 24,000 km — is Russian. Around 2.5 million people live in Russia’s Arctic regions, with ports, military bases, an icebreaker fleet and the Northern Sea Route already in place.

And the Barents Sea is home to a crucial part of the naval component of Russia’s nuclear triad — its strategic nuclear-powered submarines.

So all the European talk about the need to “confront Russia in the Arctic” is perfectly understandable.

There is just one awkward detail.

Even Danish experts acknowledge the obvious: you cannot build an Arctic order without Russia.

They are already proposing that channels of communication with Moscow be preserved, along with a framework for future cooperation:
“After Putin and Lavrov.”

Touchingly optimistic, but the concept itself is magnificent:
First spend vast sums of money, build the infrastructure and prepare to confront Russia.
And then… negotiate with Russia.

Because geopolitics can be drafted on paper in Brussels.

Geography, unfortunately, is rather harder to rewrite.

For now, much of this remains strategy, projects and intentions.

At the Arctic summit in Rovaniemi on 14 September, 12 EU countries were already calling for “adequate resources” to fund the new Arctic policy.

The only minor detail still awaiting an answer — even in Brussels — is how much all of this is going to cost and where exactly the money is supposed to come from…

#InfoDefenseAuthor
#blondinka_dk
🔴Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll